[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuLPpRrnnoMqbprzyd-YB+ap0==Dcee=REPMXoRy2C8NEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 23:18:51 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/platform: fix compilation if !CONFIG_IOMMU
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2015 13:32:33 Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>> Since these are all static functions, perhaps an "if (IS_ENABLED(...))"
>> would work here? That way you'd get compile coverage of the code in all
>> cases.
>
> I had the same thought at first.
>
>> But perhaps that doesn't work for IOMMU. I have a vague memory of
>> running across something like this before and IOMMU has this quirk of
>> defining struct iommu_ops as empty if IOMMU_API is deselected so you'll
>> probably get compiler errors unless you actually preprocess the code
>> out.
>
> Exactly.
That's precisely the issue here, so not covering this code is exactly
what we want if !CONFIG_IOMMU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists