[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXe2kdP73LhND9svDsuSwhok+661-B775Xk_=kOtoZfYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:24:46 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] MODSIGN: Use PKCS#7 for module signatures [ver #4]
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> Given that, I would say that merely shoving firmware files through the
>> module verifier as-is would not be okay.
>
> Replacing one dog and pony show for another is what is going on, what
> you describe and suggest seems best, and I welcome patches, it seems
> you know what you are talking about :)
>
Don't hold your breath. My plate is over-full. I'm probably a decent
reviewer of crypto, though.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists