[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6rxq5zOR=7LT2vdbioWp3nD0eBeELJ_d9pPk7VwTWhmStg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:12:25 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: mtd: replace "nor-jedec" binding with "jedec,spi-nor"
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
>> > So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
>> > ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
>> >
>> > // modalias = "shinynewdevice"
>> > compatible = "myvendor,shinynewdevice", "jedec,spi-nor";
>> >
>> > and also if somebody leaves off the entire shinynewdevice string:
>> >
>> > // modalias = "spi-nor"
>> > compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> >
>> > So we rework the spi-nor library to not reject "bad" names, and just
>> > fall back to autodetection, and we add the .of_match_table to properly
>> > catch all "jedec,spi-nor".
>>
>> That's nice but what about platforms using platform data instead of
>> DT? I would like to use some kind of "spi-nor" (with some prefix
>> *maybe*) for them too.
>
> For platform devices, you might as well just use the name of the driver,
> which is 'm25p80'. Isn't that how most platform devices are matched with
> drivers?
Yes and I think it's ugly because it keeps causing the warning about
read flash model not matching specified one (m25p80). Are you
seriously not going to allow platform stuff *clearly* request flash
model detection (JEDEC RDID OP)? Just because they don't use DT?
--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists