[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432203266.21715.148.camel@x220>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:14:26 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: ygardi@...eaurora.org
Cc: james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com, kishon@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, santoshsy@...il.com,
linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org, subhashj@...eaurora.org,
gbroner@...eaurora.org, dovl@...eaurora.org,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@...n.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of
SCSI_UFS_QCOM component
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks
> > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in the
> > mainline tree.
> >
>
> we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, but
> we will soon.
Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see
little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else
still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists