[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bb10330303f7911f480632ed26b1d03.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:18:10 -0000
From: ygardi@...eaurora.org
To: "Paul Bolle" <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: ygardi@...eaurora.org, james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
kishon@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
santoshsy@...il.com, linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org,
subhashj@...eaurora.org, gbroner@...eaurora.org,
dovl@...eaurora.org, "Vinayak Holikatti" <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@...n.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of
SCSI_UFS_QCOM component
> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@...eaurora.org wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks
>> > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in
>> the
>> > mainline tree.
>> >
>>
>> we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver,
>> but
>> we will soon.
>
> Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see
> little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else
> still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore.
>
fair enough. i will upload a V2 series soon. thanks for your inputs.
> Thanks,
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists