[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432242004.20840.68.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 14:00:04 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Mike Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>
Cc: oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org,
lustre-deve@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl
fixes
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 15:50 -0400, Mike Shuey wrote:
> Fix many checkpatch.pl warnings.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c
[]
> @@ -99,38 +99,42 @@ lnet_connect_console_error(int rc, lnet_nid_t peer_nid,
> switch (rc) {
> /* "normal" errors */
> case -ECONNREFUSED:
> - CNETERR("Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n",
> - libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid),
> - &peer_ip, peer_port);
> + CNETERR(
> + "Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n",
> + libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid), &peer_ip, peer_port);
These are not improvements and checkpatch messages aren't dicta.
Please don't convert code unless the conversion makes it better
for a human reader.
These don't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists