[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1505212328500.5370@hadrien>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 23:29:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc: Mike Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>, oleg.drokin@...el.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org, lustre-deve@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl
fixes
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 15:50 -0400, Mike Shuey wrote:
> > Fix many checkpatch.pl warnings.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/acceptor.c
> []
> > @@ -99,38 +99,42 @@ lnet_connect_console_error(int rc, lnet_nid_t peer_nid,
> > switch (rc) {
> > /* "normal" errors */
> > case -ECONNREFUSED:
> > - CNETERR("Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n",
> > - libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid),
> > - &peer_ip, peer_port);
> > + CNETERR(
> > + "Connection to %s at host %pI4h on port %d was refused: check that Lustre is running on that node.\n",
> > + libcfs_nid2str(peer_nid), &peer_ip, peer_port);
>
> These are not improvements and checkpatch messages aren't dicta.
>
> Please don't convert code unless the conversion makes it better
> for a human reader.
>
> These don't.
I haven't looked into it, but perhaps there is a standard kernel printing
function that these could be converted to directly?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists