linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150522092142.GJ4150@mwanda>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2015 12:21:42 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Mike Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>
Cc:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org,
	lustre-deve@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:50:23PM -0400, Mike Shuey wrote:
> This patch series cleans up code in staging/lustre/lnet - mostly spacing
> and dead function cleanup.  Should apply against linux-next 20150518.

Why are you sending a v4 of this?  We don't actually enjoy reviewing the
same patchset over and over...

Update:  I have investigated and it is because you add a few new patches
to this set which were not in the original.  Just assume that the
original patchset will be merge and send the additional patches as a new
set.

Also since no one replied to the v3 patchset and Greg has a 5000 patches
in between v3 and v4 he will not seen v4 until days after he has applied
v3 so it causes confusion.

Also you sent a v5 of this patchset but without a v5 label...

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/