[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150522172419.GG6609@krava.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:24:19 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
dsahern@...il.com, ast@...mgrid.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 28/37] perf tools: Make perf depend on libbpf
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:56:53AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
SNIP
> else
> TE_PATH=$(TRACE_EVENT_DIR)
> LIB_PATH=$(LIB_DIR)
> + BPF_PATH=$(BPF_DIR)
> endif
>
> LIBTRACEEVENT = $(TE_PATH)libtraceevent.a
> @@ -174,6 +177,9 @@ export LIBTRACEEVENT
> LIBAPI = $(LIB_PATH)libapi.a
> export LIBAPI
>
> +LIBBPF = $(BPF_PATH)/libbpf.a
> +export LIBBPF
hum, why does LIBBPF need to be exported?
if it's to match the LIBAPI, it's exported because
of its usage in the util/setup.py, which is not the
case for LIBBPF
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists