[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555F98B4.4090201@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:59:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Binutils <binutils@...rceware.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Stop relying on magic jmp behavior for early_idt_handlers
On 05/21/2015 11:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * early_idt_handlers is an array of entry points. For simplicity, it's
>>> + * a real array. We allocate nine bytes for each entry: two one-byte
>>> + * push instructions and a five-byte jump in the worst case.
>>> + */
>>> +#define EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE 9
>>
>> So how come that two plus five equals nine? ;-)
>
> A "one-byte push" would be pretty impressive :)
>
Well, non-REX register pushes are just one byte. However, these take an
immediate constant.
>>
>> Ditto for the 64-bit side.
>
> Sounds good. I'll do all this tomorrow and resend.
>
Thank you! Since I trust you, I'll send you this in advance:
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists