[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABqvwjtPdX4yfEob+LwurrT=ACdhNkwS8u9Zh9-gjBH6oo56Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:05:27 -0400
From: Michael Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups
Ah - that explains it. I added additional files to the series, but
simply re-applied the original round of patches. They would've not
been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
files had v4 in the subject.
I'll be more thorough in future patch revisions. Thanks for the explanation.
--
Mike Shuey
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:09:54AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
>> BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent. Where is that, exactly?
>> The last round of patches I sent I've kept labeled as "PATCH v4", and
>> I only hit git send-email once. Could you forward me something from
>> this v5 series, so I could see if anything is amiss on my end?
>
> I think it was not a v5. But what happened is in your series some
> of the patches were marked as v4 and some were not having any version
> so it appeared like a fresh series again. Like 1/13,2/13,3/13 has v4
> but the others donot have a version.
>
> regards
> sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists