linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 May 2015 11:24:56 +0900
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Michael Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>
Cc:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> Ah - that explains it.  I added additional files to the series, but
> simply re-applied the original round of patches.  They would've not
> been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
> files had v4 in the subject.

The way you sent these is a mess, I can't sort by subject and apply them
properly.

Either put the v4 at the front, for all patches, like this:
	[PATCH v4 01/13]
or at the end of the number:
	[PATCH 01/13 v4]
so I can sort them.

Please fix up and resend this series, I've dropped it from my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/