linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Categorize some long line length checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1432404811.2846.4.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 May 2015 11:13:31 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org,
	lustre-deve@...ts.lustre.org, Mike Shuey <shuey@...due.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Categorize some long line length checks

On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 21:07 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I feel like the lustre headers could be fit into 80 characters without
> losing very much.

Maybe.

> No one uses the complicated options on checkpatch anyway, they just grep
> away the warnings they don't like.

That'd be false.  Other projects like u-boot do.

> Newbies especially don't use them.

True, but capability exclusion doesn't seem the
right path.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/