[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150525104348.GA30252@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:43:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, "Li, Tony" <Tony.Li@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86, mwaitt: introduce mwaitx idle with a
configurable timer
* Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com> wrote:
> No, the timeout value doesn't decide how 'deep' the power state
> enters. Basically, the same power consumption with any timeout.
>
> I summarized the comparison of mwait and mwaitx
>
> MWAIT MWAITX
> opcode 0f 01 c9 | 0f 01 fb
> ECX[0] value of RFLAGS.IF seen by instruction
> ECX[1] unused/#GP if set | enable timer if set
> ECX[31:2] unused/#GP if set
> EAX unused
> EBX[31:0] unused | max wait time (loops)
>
>
> MONITOR MONITORX
> opcode 0f 01 c8 | 0f 01 fa
> EAX (logical) address to monitor
> ECX #GP if not zero
Ok, thanks for the clarification!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists