[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432575846.6866.31.camel@odin.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:44:06 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...n.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
Ionut Alexa <ionut.m.alexa@...il.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 01/13] exit: Clarify choice of new parent in
forget_original_parent()
Second parameter of find_new_reaper() and the similarity of its name
and find_child_reaper()'s confuse a reader.
Rename find_child_reaper() for better conformity of its name and its
function. Also delete the second parameter of find_new_reaper().
These both improve modularity.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...n.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 22fcc05..a29c35d 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_alive_thread(struct task_struct *p)
return NULL;
}
-static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
+static void check_pid_ns_reaper_exit(struct task_struct *father)
__releases(&tasklist_lock)
__acquires(&tasklist_lock)
{
@@ -458,12 +458,12 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
struct task_struct *reaper = pid_ns->child_reaper;
if (likely(reaper != father))
- return reaper;
+ return;
reaper = find_alive_thread(father);
if (reaper) {
pid_ns->child_reaper = reaper;
- return reaper;
+ return;
}
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -473,8 +473,6 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
}
zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
-
- return father;
}
/*
@@ -484,15 +482,16 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
* child_subreaper for its children (like a service manager)
* 3. give it to the init process (PID 1) in our pid namespace
*/
-static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father,
- struct task_struct *child_reaper)
+static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
{
- struct task_struct *thread, *reaper;
+ struct task_struct *thread, *reaper, *child_reaper;
thread = find_alive_thread(father);
if (thread)
return thread;
+ child_reaper = task_active_pid_ns(father)->child_reaper;
+
if (father->signal->has_child_subreaper) {
/*
* Find the first ->is_child_subreaper ancestor in our pid_ns.
@@ -557,11 +556,11 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct *father,
exit_ptrace(father, dead);
/* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */
- reaper = find_child_reaper(father);
+ check_pid_ns_reaper_exit(father);
if (list_empty(&father->children))
return;
- reaper = find_new_reaper(father, reaper);
+ reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
list_for_each_entry(p, &father->children, sibling) {
for_each_thread(p, t) {
t->real_parent = reaper;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists