[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150527164312.a22ad8bb748acaddbea3bf70@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:43:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] security_syslog() should be called once only
On Sun, 24 May 2015 19:18:40 +0300 Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> v2: subject changed, patch comment modified
>
> Fixes: 637241a900cb ("kmsg: honor dmesg_restrict sysctl on /dev/kmsg")
>
> Final version of patch 637241a900cb ("kmsg: honor dmesg_restrict sysctl
> on /dev/kmsg") lost few hooks, as result security_syslog() are processed
> incorrectly:
> - open of /dev/kmsg checks syslog access permissions by using
> check_syslog_permissions() where security_syslog() is not called
> if dmesg_restrict is set.
> - syslog syscall and /proc/kmsg calls do_syslog()
> where security_syslog can be executed twice
> (inside check_syslog_permissions() and then directly in do_syslog())
>
> With this patch security_syslog() is called once only in all syslog-related
> operations regardless of dmesg_restrict value.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -484,11 +484,11 @@ int check_syslog_permissions(int type, bool from_file)
> * already done the capabilities checks at open time.
> */
> if (from_file && type != SYSLOG_ACTION_OPEN)
> - return 0;
> + goto ok;
So we run security_syslog() for actions other than open() (of kmsg).
Why?
Also, that from_file handling makes me cry.
#define SYSLOG_FROM_READER 0
#define SYSLOG_FROM_PROC 1
That's not a boolean - it's an enumerated value with two values
currently defined.
But the code in check_syslog_permissions() treats it as a boolean and
also hardwires the knowledge that SYSLOG_FROM_PROC == 1 (or == `true`).
And the name is wrong: it should be called from_proc to match
SYSLOG_FROM_PROC.
One possible fix would be something like this, plus various
fixups/audit:
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c~security_syslog-should-be-called-once-only-fix
+++ a/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -489,13 +489,13 @@ static int syslog_action_restricted(int
type != SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_BUFFER;
}
-int check_syslog_permissions(int type, bool from_file)
+int check_syslog_permissions(int type, int source)
{
/*
* If this is from /proc/kmsg and we've already opened it, then we've
* already done the capabilities checks at open time.
*/
- if (from_file && type != SYSLOG_ACTION_OPEN)
+ if (source == SYSLOG_FROM_PROC && type != SYSLOG_ACTION_OPEN)
goto ok;
if (syslog_action_restricted(type)) {
_
And `type' should be renamed to `action' for heavens sake. Kees, were
you drunk?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists