linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: max77693: Store I2C device type as enum and add default unknown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150527122418.GM11677@x1>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2015 13:24:18 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
Cc:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: max77693: Store I2C device type as enum and
 add default unknown

On Wed, 27 May 2015, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Wed, 27 May 2015, Krzysztof Kozłowski wrote:
> 
> > 2015-05-27 19:23 GMT+09:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> > > On Sun, 24 May 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >
> > >> Store the device type (obtained from i2c_device_id) as an enum and add a
> > >> default type of unknown to distinguish from case when this is not set
> > >> at all.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  include/linux/mfd/max77693-private.h | 11 ++++++-----
> > >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > I was thinking about merging everything through one tree because of
> > the dependency (successive patches depend on previous) but I don't
> > mind choosing different strategy. However if you picked this one maybe
> > you can also apply the patch 1/9:
> > mfd/extcon: max77693: Remove unused extern declarations and max77693_dev members
> > 
> > It already got ack from Chanwoo.
> > 
> > Other patches depend on these so either everything will go through
> > your tree or you will prepare an immutable branch for e.g. Mark (as
> > everything is around regulator drivers).
> > 
> > Anyway I need some input from Mark about the patches 4, 5 and 9. Rest
> > of them already have his ack.
> 
> I'm happy to do that.  Just let me know when you have all the Acks you
> need and I'll apply them all at once.

In fact, it's probably better to withdraw this patch too, then apply
it with all the others.

Patch unapplied (but you can add my Ack).

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/