[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150527191526.GA17823@WorkStation.home>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:15:26 -0400
From: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue
Hi Eric,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:24:16AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 12:54 -0400, Ido Yariv wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
>
> > That's a nice optimization ;)
> >
> > However, I think that with Nicholas Mc Guire's recent changes to
> > msecs_to_jiffies (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143195210010666),
> > we should get this for free, no?
>
> Well, on net and net-next tree we currently have :
>
> $ grep msecs_to_jiffies include/linux/jiffies.h
> extern unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m);
>
> Given your patch is for stable, I would not mind having this done
> anyway.
I believe these changes are in tip, but not in net/net-next just yet.
I actually didn't think this patch is for stable, but we can certainly
do that.
Would you be fine with the patch below? Please note that I modified your
optimization a bit.
Cheers,
Ido.
>From 6b406d4746fe5523f29863c10e43ab8bba913307 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 08:23:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v4] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue
The Tail Loss Probe RFC specifies that the PTO value should be set to
max(2 * SRTT, 10ms), where SRTT is the smoothed round-trip time.
The PTO value is converted to jiffies, so the timer may expire
prematurely.
This is especially problematic on systems in which HZ <= 100, so work
around this by setting the timeout to at least 2 jiffies on such
systems.
The 10ms figure was originally selected based on tests performed with
the current implementation and HZ = 1000. Thus, leave the behavior on
systems with HZ > 100 unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@...el.com>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 2bb2bad..d22c93c 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1751,4 +1751,21 @@ static inline void skb_set_tcp_pure_ack(struct sk_buff *skb)
skb->truesize = 2;
}
+/* Convert msecs to jiffies, ensuring that the return value is always at least
+ * 2 jiffies.
+ * This can be used when setting tick-based timers to guarantee that they won't
+ * expire right away.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m)
+{
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(m)) {
+ if (m * HZ > MSEC_PER_SEC)
+ return msecs_to_jiffies(m);
+
+ return 2;
+ }
+
+ return max_t(u32, 2, msecs_to_jiffies(m));
+}
+
#endif /* _TCP_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 534e5fd..83021c5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
if (tp->packets_out == 1)
timeout = max_t(u32, timeout,
(rtt + (rtt >> 1) + TCP_DELACK_MAX));
- timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+ timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(10));
/* If RTO is shorter, just schedule TLP in its place. */
tlp_time_stamp = tcp_time_stamp + timeout;
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists