linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150528043729.GA32339@WorkStation.home>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 00:37:29 -0400
From:	Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue

Hi Eric,

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:15:26PM -0400, Ido Yariv wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:24:16AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 12:54 -0400, Ido Yariv wrote:
> > > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > > That's a nice optimization ;)
> > > 
> > > However, I think that with Nicholas Mc Guire's recent changes to
> > > msecs_to_jiffies (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143195210010666),
> > > we should get this for free, no?
> > 
> > Well, on net and net-next tree we currently have :
> > 
> > $ grep msecs_to_jiffies include/linux/jiffies.h
> > extern unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m);
> > 
> > Given your patch is for stable, I would not mind having this done
> > anyway.
> 
> I believe these changes are in tip, but not in net/net-next just yet.
> 
> I actually didn't think this patch is for stable, but we can certainly
> do that.
> 
> Would you be fine with the patch below? Please note that I modified your
> optimization a bit.

We'd probably like to avoid any potential integer overflows as well, so
I modified the if statement accordingly.

Not sure this optimization is really beneficial (and only on stable
kernels), but here's the updated patch.

Cheers,
Ido.

>From 8d78f75cde8ef523a312e6cfab8e1b7a89f97c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 08:23:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v5] net: tcp: Fix a PTO timing granularity issue

The Tail Loss Probe RFC specifies that the PTO value should be set to
max(2 * SRTT, 10ms), where SRTT is the smoothed round-trip time.

The PTO value is converted to jiffies, so the timer may expire
prematurely.

This is especially problematic on systems in which HZ <= 100, so work
around this by setting the timeout to at least 2 jiffies on such
systems.

The 10ms figure was originally selected based on tests performed with
the current implementation and HZ = 1000. Thus, leave the behavior on
systems with HZ > 100 unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <idox.yariv@...el.com>
---
 include/net/tcp.h     | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 2bb2bad..19ed4c0 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1751,4 +1751,24 @@ static inline void skb_set_tcp_pure_ack(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	skb->truesize = 2;
 }
 
+/* Convert msecs to jiffies, ensuring that the return value is at least 2
+ * jiffies.
+ * This can be used when setting tick-based timers to guarantee that they won't
+ * expire right away.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(const unsigned int m)
+{
+	if (__builtin_constant_p(m)) {
+		/* The theoretical upper bound of m for 2 jiffies is 2 seconds,
+		 * so compare m with that to avoid potential integer overflows.
+		 */
+		if ((m > 2 * MSEC_PER_SEC) || (m * HZ > 2 * MSEC_PER_SEC))
+			return msecs_to_jiffies(m);
+
+		return 2;
+	}
+
+	return max_t(u32, 2, msecs_to_jiffies(m));
+}
+
 #endif	/* _TCP_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 190538a..26cc5a6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ bool tcp_schedule_loss_probe(struct sock *sk)
 	if (tp->packets_out == 1)
 		timeout = max_t(u32, timeout,
 				(rtt + (rtt >> 1) + TCP_DELACK_MAX));
-	timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, msecs_to_jiffies(10));
+	timeout = max_t(u32, timeout, tcp_safe_msecs_to_jiffies(10));
 
 	/* If RTO is shorter, just schedule TLP in its place. */
 	tlp_time_stamp = tcp_time_stamp + timeout;
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/