lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAqcGH=KX+wJ0Td2crMe9QzWHoy7ODjGJRyLePs1rYPVXcD_Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 07:43:20 +0300
From:	Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@...aro.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf tests: don't use obsolete syscalls

Hi,

On 16 April 2015 at 19:17, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@...aro.org>
>>
>> The following hopefully trivial patches remove the use of legacy syscalls
>> from perf test subcommands. Patch 2/3 is optional, and would make the delta
>> a lot smaller.

>> Riku Voipio (3):
>>   perf tests: switch from open to openat
>>   perf tests: rename open*.c
>>   perf tests: remove getpgrp from mmap-basic

> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Via who should the patches to tools/perf/tests go to ? I didn't get
any improvement requests nor have I seen these merged to anyones tree
so far,

Riku
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ