[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5566B0EA.1020007@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:08:42 +0800
From: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
CC: <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<sjenning@...hat.com>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<vojtech@...e.cz>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
<mingo@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] arm64: add livepatch support
On 2015/4/24 17:27, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
>> This patchset enables livepatch support on arm64.
>>
>> Livepatch was merged in v4.0, and allows replacying a function dynamically
>> based on ftrace framework, but it also requires -mfentry option of gcc.
>> Currently arm64 gcc doesn't support it, but by adding a helper function to
>> ftrace, we will be able to support livepatch on arch's which don't support
>> this option.
>>
>> I submit this patchset as RFC since I'm not quite sure that I'm doing
>> in the right way, or we should definitely support -fentry instead.
>
> I don't have arm64 cross-compiler handy, could you please copy/paste how
> does function prologue, generated by gcc -pg on arm64 look like?
>
The function prologue on arm64 with gcc -pg look like as following:
func:
stp x29, x30, [sp, -48]!
add x29, sp, 0
mov x1, x30
str w0, [x29,28]
mov x0, x1
bl _mcount
...
Thanks,
Li Bin
> Thanks,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists