[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528085807.GA31001@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:58:07 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"sjenning@...hat.com" <sjenning@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"vojtech@...e.cz" <vojtech@...e.cz>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"live-patching@...r.kernel.org" <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] arm64: add livepatch support
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 07:08:42AM +0100, Li Bin wrote:
> On 2015/4/24 17:27, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >
> >> This patchset enables livepatch support on arm64.
> >>
> >> Livepatch was merged in v4.0, and allows replacying a function dynamically
> >> based on ftrace framework, but it also requires -mfentry option of gcc.
> >> Currently arm64 gcc doesn't support it, but by adding a helper function to
> >> ftrace, we will be able to support livepatch on arch's which don't support
> >> this option.
> >>
> >> I submit this patchset as RFC since I'm not quite sure that I'm doing
> >> in the right way, or we should definitely support -fentry instead.
> >
> > I don't have arm64 cross-compiler handy, could you please copy/paste how
> > does function prologue, generated by gcc -pg on arm64 look like?
> >
>
> The function prologue on arm64 with gcc -pg look like as following:
> func:
> stp x29, x30, [sp, -48]!
> add x29, sp, 0
> mov x1, x30
> str w0, [x29,28]
> mov x0, x1
> bl _mcount
Just for the avoidance of confusion, this looks like a function with
a live parameter in x0, which explains the str to the stack and the
juggling of x30 into x0. I don't think there's necessarily a golden
template for the prologue code.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists