[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55671925.8080305@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:33:25 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, jhladky@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, dedekind1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa
balancing destination
On 05/28/2015 07:07 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * riel@...hat.com <riel@...hat.com> [2015-05-27 15:04:28]:
>
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index c47bf0dffb34..f655f2ad155d 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,30 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/* Only move tasks to a NUMA node less busy than the current node. */
>> +static bool numa_has_capacity(struct task_numa_env *env)
>> +{
>> + struct numa_stats *src = &env->src_stats;
>> + struct numa_stats *dst = &env->dst_stats;
>> +
>> + if (src->has_free_capacity && !dst->has_free_capacity)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Only consider a task move if the source has a higher destination
>> + * than the destination, corrected for CPU capacity on each node.
>
> In the above comment, did you mean source has higher load than the
> destination?
Uh yes, indeed. Thanks for spotting that.
Peter, do you want me to send a v2 with the typo fixed, or
is it easier for you to fix up the typo before committing?
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists