linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destination

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150528133740.GJ3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 15:37:40 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, jhladky@...hat.com,
	mingo@...nel.org, dedekind1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa,sched: only consider less busy nodes as numa
 balancing destination

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:33:25AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Peter, do you want me to send a v2 with the typo fixed, or
> is it easier for you to fix up the typo before committing?

Please send a new one, and also fix the Changelog to only include 12
char SHA1 references :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/