[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000401d09962$f528f050$df7ad0f0$@com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 01:25:43 +0900
From: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@...il.com>
To: "'Hyungwon Hwang'" <human.hwang@...sung.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Lee Jones'" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: change the return type of backlight_update_status() to int
On Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:25 PM, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:
>
> Backlight device returns the result of update_status(), but
> backlight_update_status() ignores it. So the consumers cannot confirm the
> result of their function call. This patch makes the result to be returned
> back for consumers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hwang@...sung.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/backlight.h | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/backlight.h b/include/linux/backlight.h
> index adb14a8..1e7a69a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backlight.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backlight.h
> @@ -117,12 +117,16 @@ struct backlight_device {
> int use_count;
> };
>
> -static inline void backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
> +static inline int backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
> {
> + int ret = -ENOENT;
> +
> mutex_lock(&bd->update_lock);
> if (bd->ops && bd->ops->update_status)
> - bd->ops->update_status(bd);
> + ret = bd->ops->update_status(bd);
> mutex_unlock(&bd->update_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> extern struct backlight_device *backlight_device_register(const char *name,
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists