[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528191844.GU23057@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:18:44 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jkosina@...e.cz, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
bp@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: extend use case for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:09:23PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2015 11:56:01 -0700
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
>
> > + Some maintainers and developers may however have a preference to
> > + require EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() when adding any new APIs or functionality.
>
> As a nit, I would take out "have a preference to".
Fine by me, do you need a new submission on my part of can you amend yourself?
> From what I can tell, there are developers who think this position makes
> little sense and, perhaps, risks diluting the value of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> by attaching it to everything. My inclination, though, would be to accept
> this change as documentation of clear existing practice; whether that
> practice should change is, I think, a separate discussion.
Great, thanks.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists