linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function pointer casting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 19:11:14 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
To:	Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function
 pointer casting

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
<andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com> wrote:
> Instead of casting the encode and decode functions to the required type when
> assigning them to the p_encode and p_decode members of struct rpc_procinfo,
> define the functions with their proper type and cast the additional obj
> argument to the appropriate type inside those functions. This allows slightly
> better type checking by the compiler at the cost of slightly more verbose code.

How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why does
it deserve to bypass the NFS tree?

Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/