[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h82sjyXEz2GN=ttD3t-Z-owCyZTsfpkXc3D+KehwcAmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:34:32 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@...com>,
Luis Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/12] drivers/block/pmem: Map NVDIMM with ioremap_wt()
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 11:19 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 07:43 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:19:04AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> >> >> The pmem driver maps NVDIMM with ioremap_nocache() as we cannot
> :
>> >> >> - pmem->virt_addr = ioremap_nocache(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
>> >> >> + pmem->virt_addr = ioremap_wt(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
>> >> >> if (!pmem->virt_addr)
>> >> >> goto out_release_region;
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan, Ross, what about this one?
>> >> >
>> >> > ACK to pick it up as a temporary solution?
>> >>
>> >> I see that is_new_memtype_allowed() is updated to disallow some
>> >> combinations, but the manual seems to imply any mixing of memory types
>> >> is unsupported. Which worries me even in the current code where we
>> >> have uncached mappings in the driver, and potentially cached DAX
>> >> mappings handed out to userspace.
>> >
>> > is_new_memtype_allowed() is not to allow some combinations of mixing of
>> > memory types. When it is allowed, the requested type of ioremap_xxx()
>> > is changed to match with the existing map type, so that mixing of memory
>> > types does not happen.
>>
>> Yes, but now if the caller was expecting one memory type and gets
>> another one that is something I think the driver would want to know.
>> At a minimum I don't think we want to get emails about pmem driver
>> performance problems when someone's platform is silently degrading WB
>> to UC for example.
>
> The pmem driver creates an ioremap map to an NVDIMM range first. So,
> there will be no conflict at this point, unless there is a conflicting
> driver claiming the same NVDIMM range.
Hmm, I thought it would be WB due to this comment in is_new_memtype_allowed()
/*
* PAT type is always WB for untracked ranges, so no need to check.
*/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists