[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150601081924.GR19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:19:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: sched_setscheduler() vs idle_balance() race
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:08:26PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Seems trying to make the target invisible to balancing created a new
> race: dequeue target, do stuff that may drop rq->lock while it's
> dequeued, target sneaks into schedule(), dequeues itself (#2), boom.
Aw god yes, duh.
Fun little puzzle this. Lemme go think a bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists