[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506021501070.3786@nanos>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:59:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
cc: joro@...tes.org, dwmw2@...radead.org, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v8 3/9] iommu, x86: Implement irq_set_vcpu_affinity for
intel_ir_chip
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Feng Wu wrote:
> + /* stop posting interrupts, back to remapping mode */
> + if (!vcpu_info) {
> + modify_irte(&ir_data->irq_2_iommu, &ir_data->irte_entry);
> + } else {
> + vcpu_pi_info = (struct vcpu_data *)vcpu_info;
> +
> + /*
> + * "ir_data->irte_entry" saves the remapped format of IRTE,
> + * which being a cached irte is still updated when setting
> + * the affinity even when we are in posted mode. So this make
s/make/makes/
> + * it possible to switch back to remapped mode from posted mode,
> + * we can just set "ir_data->irte_entry" to hardware for that
> + * purpose. Here we store the posted format of IRTE in another
> + * new member "ir_data->irte_pi_entry" to not corrupt
Remove the 'another new member' please. That member is not longer new
once that patch is applied.
Now there is another question. Are we actually using that pi_entry
cached value for anything else than this code here? If not, we can do
this on the stack and avoid the extra storage in ir_data.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists