[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506022110400.20347@nanos>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 21:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
cc: arnd@...db.de, john.stultz@...aro.org, heenasirwani@...il.com,
pang.xunlei@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/25] timekeeping:Introduce the timekeeping_clocktai()
function with timespec64 type
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Subject: timekeeping:Introduce the timekeeping_clocktai() function with timespec64 type
You are not introducing anything new. You change the implementation.
> This patch converts the timespec type to timespec64 type for
> timekeeping_clocktai() function which is used only in the
> posix-timers.c file, that makes it ready for 2038 issue.
>
> And remove the declaration of timekeeping_clocktai() in
> kernel/time/timekeeping.h file, cause nothing uses that
> declaration now, and it would conflict with the inline
> definition in the include/linux/timekeeping.h file.
>
> Also introduce the clock_get64 callback pointer for the k_clock
> structure, and convert the timespec type to timespec64 type for
> the posix_get_tai() function.
Stop explaining WHAT your patches are doing.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists