linux-kernel - LOCKDEP warning due to ext_devt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150528123233.3df8ff55@notabene.brown>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 12:32:33 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: LOCKDEP warning due to ext_devt_lock


Hi Keith,
 I'm getting lockdep warning around use of ext_devt_lock.

[11428.266019] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.

 As you say in
    2da78092dda1 ("block: Fix dev_t minor allocation lifetime")
ext_devt_lock can be taken from call_rcu's soft-irq.
I think that means it should always use the _irq verion of spinlock.

I've been using the following patch and the LOCKDEP message are gone.

If you agree, could you forward it or something similar upstream?
Thanks,
NeilBrown


Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 666e11b83983..d1338934562e 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ int blk_alloc_devt(struct hd_struct *part, dev_t *devt)
 	/* allocate ext devt */
 	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
 
-	spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 	idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_NOWAIT);
-	spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 
 	idr_preload_end();
 	if (idx < 0)
@@ -449,9 +449,9 @@ void blk_free_devt(dev_t devt)
 		return;
 
 	if (MAJOR(devt) == BLOCK_EXT_MAJOR) {
-		spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 		idr_remove(&ext_devt_idr, blk_mangle_minor(MINOR(devt)));
-		spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -690,13 +690,13 @@ struct gendisk *get_gendisk(dev_t devt, int *partno)
 	} else {
 		struct hd_struct *part;
 
-		spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 		part = idr_find(&ext_devt_idr, blk_mangle_minor(MINOR(devt)));
 		if (part && get_disk(part_to_disk(part))) {
 			*partno = part->partno;
 			disk = part_to_disk(part);
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&ext_devt_lock);
 	}
 
 	return disk;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped