[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556F3388.607@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:04:08 +0100
From: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>
To: Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ts2020: Provide DVBv5 API signal strength
On 03/06/15 17:43, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 07:37 PM, David Howells wrote:
>> Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Yes, also, the workqueue appears not to be initialized when using
>>>>> the dvb
>>>>> attached method.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what you're referring to. It's initialised in
>>>> ts2020_probe()
>>>> just after the ts2020_priv struct is allocated - the only place it is
>>>> allocated.
>>>>
>>> ts2020_probe() isn't touched by devices not converted to I2C binding.
>>
>> Hmmm... Doesn't that expose a larger problem? The only place the
>> ts2020_priv
>> struct is allocated is in ts2020_probe() within ts2020.c and the struct
>> definition is private to that file and so it can't be allocated from
>> outside.
>> So if you don't pass through ts2020_probe(), fe->tuner_priv will
>> remain NULL
>> and the driver will crash.
>
> Malcolm misses some pending patches where attach() is wrapped to I2C
> model probe().
> http://git.linuxtv.org/cgit.cgi/anttip/media_tree.git/log/?h=ts2020
>
Hmmm... Yes, I am indeed missing those patches.
I will test.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists