[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605090433.GC1528@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:04:33 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] time: Do leapsecond adjustment in gettime
fastpaths
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That leaves the question; for who is this exact second edge important?
Distributed applications using the UTC time scale.
Many control applications are done with a 1 millisecond period.
Having the time wrong by a second for 10 or 100 loops is bad news.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists