[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605002748.GB17429@gwshan>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:27:48 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v11 21/34] powerpc/powernv/ioda2: Add TCE
invalidation for all attached groups
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:44:45PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>The iommu_table struct keeps a list of IOMMU groups it is used for.
>At the moment there is just a single group attached but further
>patches will add TCE table sharing. When sharing is enabled, TCE cache
>in each PE needs to be invalidated so does the patch.
>
>This does not change pnv_pci_ioda1_tce_invalidate() as there is no plan
>to enable TCE table sharing on PHBs older than IODA2.
>
>Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
>Changes:
>v10:
>* new to the series
>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>index 3fd8b18..94fccc8 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
>+#include <linux/rculist.h>
>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
>@@ -1764,23 +1765,15 @@ static inline void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_invalidate_entire(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> __raw_writeq(cpu_to_be64(val), phb->ioda.tce_inval_reg);
> }
>
>-static void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_invalidate(struct iommu_table *tbl,
>- unsigned long index, unsigned long npages, bool rm)
>+static void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_do_invalidate(unsigned pe_number, bool rm,
>+ __be64 __iomem *invalidate, unsigned shift,
>+ unsigned long index, unsigned long npages)
The better function name would be: pnv_pci_ioda2_do_tce_invalidate(), and
it seems we needn't "bool rm" any more since "invalidate" has been assigned
with virtual/real address by caller.
Thanks,
Gavin
> {
>- struct iommu_table_group_link *tgl = list_first_entry_or_null(
>- &tbl->it_group_list, struct iommu_table_group_link,
>- next);
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = container_of(tgl->table_group,
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe, table_group);
> unsigned long start, end, inc;
>- __be64 __iomem *invalidate = rm ?
>- (__be64 __iomem *)pe->phb->ioda.tce_inval_reg_phys :
>- pe->phb->ioda.tce_inval_reg;
>- const unsigned shift = tbl->it_page_shift;
>
> /* We'll invalidate DMA address in PE scope */
> start = 0x2ull << 60;
>- start |= (pe->pe_number & 0xFF);
>+ start |= (pe_number & 0xFF);
> end = start;
>
> /* Figure out the start, end and step */
>@@ -1798,6 +1791,24 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_invalidate(struct iommu_table *tbl,
> }
> }
>
>+static void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_invalidate(struct iommu_table *tbl,
>+ unsigned long index, unsigned long npages, bool rm)
>+{
>+ struct iommu_table_group_link *tgl;
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tgl, &tbl->it_group_list, next) {
>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = container_of(tgl->table_group,
>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe, table_group);
>+ __be64 __iomem *invalidate = rm ?
>+ (__be64 __iomem *)pe->phb->ioda.tce_inval_reg_phys :
>+ pe->phb->ioda.tce_inval_reg;
>+
>+ pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_do_invalidate(pe->pe_number, rm,
>+ invalidate, tbl->it_page_shift,
>+ index, npages);
>+ }
>+}
>+
> static int pnv_ioda2_tce_build(struct iommu_table *tbl, long index,
> long npages, unsigned long uaddr,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
>--
>2.4.0.rc3.8.gfb3e7d5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists