[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605095738.GB7893@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:57:38 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, ktkhai@...allels.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...il.com,
pang.xunlei@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com,
wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] sched,lockdep: Employ lock pinning
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
> 'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
btw., could we perhaps reorder this series a bit and first see that it properly
detects the original locking bug, and then only fix the bug?
To make sure the pinning infrastructure works and all that.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists