[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506051159110.4155@nanos>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:59:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: y2038@...ts.linaro.org, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v4 06/25] time/posix-timers:Introduce {get,
put}_timespec and {get, put}_itimerspec
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> int get_timespec64(struct timespec64 *ts, const struct timespec __user *uts)
> {
> struct timespec64 tmp;
> int ret;
>
> if (sizeof(tmp) == sizeof(*ts))
> return copy_from_user(&tmp, uts, sizeof(*ts)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>
> ret = copy_from_user(&tmp, uts, sizeof(*ts));
> if (ret)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> ts->tv_sec = tmp.tv_sec;
> ts->tv_nsec = tmp.tv_nsec;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> This works fine, but I'd have to change it to copy from a __user
> __kernel_timespec instead of timespec in my system call series, and
> in order to do that, we must ensure that I can change over all callers
> at the same time, so with the function prototype above, we should not
> start using get_timespec64 for anything outside of posix-timers.c.
That's fine I think.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists