[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKT61h8kN33D03jV7pJ7b25p9M6JSPm2WxLgh4DhJxnteHQnrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 18:01:56 +0800
From: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Wan ZongShun <Vincent.Wan@....com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wan ZongShun <linux@...os.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SDHCI: Change AMD SDHCI quirk application scope
2015-06-05 17:20 GMT+08:00 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:37:09AM +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote:
>> Boris, I means I put this KERCZ Mircro in pci_ids.h, and I also will
>> send the other patch to instead the following '0x790b' of codes. I
>> think it is reasonable, right?
>
> No, it means two things:
>
> * why does it contain KERNCZ? What does that mean?
The KERNCZ is new AMD SB/FCH generation name, like HUDSON2 is old FCH
generation.
We will adopt 0x790b as device ID since from this KERNCZ gereration.
>
> * #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_<better_name>_SMBUS 0x790b should be in
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c as it is used only there.
The i2cpiix4.c driver and eMMC driver both will use this device ID
macro, Do you think I should submit two patches synchronously? like
patch1: change i2cpiix4 driver to use PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_KERNCZ_SMBUS,
patch2: for eMMC quirk in sdhci-pci.c?
And then the PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_KERNCZ_SMBUS can be go into pci ids.h?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
> --
--
Wan ZongShun.
www.mcuos.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists