[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605133333.GU20384@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:33:33 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v9 0/9] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - IOMMU part
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:47:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Feng Wu wrote:
> > Divide the whole series which contain multiple components into three parts:
> > - Prerequisite changes to irq subsystem (already merged in tip tree x86/apic branch)
> > - IOMMU part (in this series)
>
> Please add
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Which tree should this go through? It depends on tip/x86/apic AFAICT,
> so we can take it through that, if Joerg provides his ACK.
Yeah, these changes depend on tip/x86/apic, so it doesn't make sense to
send them through the iommu tree. There will be some conflicts when
merging tip/x86/apic and the iommu tree together, though, mainly because
of the vt-d kdump fixing patches I have in my tree. The conflicts are
spread over 3 files, but not too serious and easy to resolve.
Anyway, you have my
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
for those.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists