[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150605133714.GH3679@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:37:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename ia32entry.S to entry_64_compat_32.S
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:00:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme:
>
> entry_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit kernels
> entry_64.S # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
> entry_64_compat_32.S # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
>
> Another option would be:
>
> arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S
> arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S
> arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S
I like this one better because entry_64_compat_32 kinda has both bitness in
there and confuses me more.
Just my 2 ยข. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists