linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] acpi, apei: use EFI memmap to map GHES memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5571D1AE.4050605@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 09:43:26 -0700
From:	"Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
CC:	rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
	leif.lindholm@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org, fu.wei@...aro.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
	vgandhi@...eaurora.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] acpi, apei: use EFI memmap to map GHES memory

Thanks Matt for the review. Yes, you are right on, I am following
this:
 > modify ghes_ioremap_* to query the EFI memmap (if
 > it's available at runtime) to lookup the correct mapping attributes.

Jonathan

On 6/5/2015 2:57 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> [ Cc'ing Boris and Tony. Folks original patch is here,
>    https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433185940-24770-4-git-send-email-zjzhang@codeaurora.org ]
>
> On Mon, 01 Jun, at 12:12:20PM, Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang wrote:
>> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> With ACPI APEI firmware first handling, generic hardware error
>> record is updated by firmware in GHES memory region. When firmware
>> updated GHES memory region in DDR without going through cache,
>> Linux reads stale data from cache.
>>
>> GHES memory region should be mapped with cache attributes
>> according to EFI memory map when applicable. If firmware updates
>> DDR directly, EFI memory map has GHES memory region defined as
>> uncached; If firmware updates cache, EFI memory map has GHES
>> memory region defined as cached.
>>
>> When EFI is configued, map IRQ page using efi_remap() provided by
>> EFI subsystem.
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static void __iomem *ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi(u64 pfn)
>>   	return (void __iomem *)vaddr;
>>   }
>>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI
>>   static void __iomem *ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq(u64 pfn)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned long vaddr;
>
> Sprinkling CONFIG_EFI like this is wrong. On x86 we run kernels built
> with CONFIG_EFI on machines with BIOS - you can't make the EFI vs.
> non-EFI decision at compile-time.
>
> So this patch looks like a potential regression to me since on x86
> ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() would not be used anymore and instead we'd be
> using efi_remap() which will perform an ioremap_nocache() if it gets
> called after efi_free_boot_services().
>
> And based on the comments in the apei code, that's going to cause issues
> because ioremap() does not work in atomic context, not to mention the
> fact that we've gone from a cached mapping to an uncached one.
>
> Instead, I suggest you modify ghes_ioremap_* to query the EFI memmap (if
> it's available at runtime) to lookup the correct mapping attributes.
>
> But I've Cc'd some more people who have actually worked on this code,
> since I'm not one of them.
>

-- 
Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/