[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED30946-5333-4684-9498-B734D991847A@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 20:58:40 +0000
From: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"<HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>" <HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org>,
"<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lustre: question about lov_request.c
Hello!
You are right, set_pga seems to be a dead member. It was alive a once, but somehow not fully removed now,
so it's safe to drop the whole if and also the struct member itself.
set_oabufs could be dropped as well.
Thanks.
Bye,
Oleg
On Jun 7, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The function lov_finish_set in
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_request.c contains the code:
>
> if (set->set_pga) {
> int len = set->set_oabufs * sizeof(*set->set_pga);
> OBD_FREE_LARGE(set->set_pga, len);
> }
>
> If I change the call to OBD_FREE_LARGE to kvfree, then len is not useful
> any more. But actually, at least with grep, I can't find anywhere that
> either the set_pga field or the set_oabufs field is set. Am I missing
> something, or can the whole if be removed? Can these two fields go too?
>
> thanks,
> julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists