[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5575D9C4.50204@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 20:07:00 +0200
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Louis Langholtz <lou_langholtz@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trivial patch monkey <trivial@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: Deprecate BUG_ON() use in new code, introduce
CRASH_ON()
Am 08.06.2015 um 13:27 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
>
> * Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> wrote:
>
>>> I am pretty certain that Greg would have applied such a patch in an eye blink.
>>
>> As you've said it, *probably*. But such a simple exit path as you're proposing
>> doesn't always exist. [...]
>
> As I said it's case by case. I discussed your example (which was a deficient patch
> for multiple reasons) but we'd be wasting everyone's time by discussion
> hypothethical situations.
Sure it was a deficient patch, but still better than what existed for a
year long in the kernel and which leaded to a reset of a system sometime
after a wireless remote connected device was turned off. And it showed
exactly where the problem existed. Maybe I should mention that almost a
year after I've posted that patch, people still stumbled over the
problem (and likely had the same hard time to find the reason for a
sudden reboot without any warning).
I just want to make clear that a brutforce slogan like BUG_ON is bad is
bad, especially as there are many people which just might repeat that
slogan without thinking about what they are repeating.
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists