linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:exynos-cpufreq - Fix for memory leak in case SOC name does not match.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8344426.BL3KyufMos@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jun 2015 01:30:35 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:exynos-cpufreq - Fix for memory leak in case SOC name does not match.

On Monday, June 08, 2015 10:31:00 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
> 
> > On 25-05-15, 07:39, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> > > During probe free the memory allocated to "exynos_info" in case of
> > > unknown SOC type.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |    6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > > b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index 82d2fbb..8682378 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev) ret = exynos5250_cpufreq_init(exynos_info);
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		pr_err("%s: Unknown SoC type\n", __func__);
> > > -		return -ENODEV;
> > > +		ret = -ENODEV;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	if (ret)
> > > @@ -190,12 +190,14 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev) 
> > >  	if (exynos_info->set_freq == NULL) {
> > >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No set_freq function
> > > (ERR)\n");
> > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > >  		goto err_vdd_arm;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	arm_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vdd_arm");
> > >  	if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
> > >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get resource
> > > vdd_arm\n");
> > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > >  		goto err_vdd_arm;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > @@ -227,7 +229,7 @@ err_cpufreq_reg:
> > >  	regulator_put(arm_regulator);
> > >  err_vdd_arm:
> > >  	kfree(exynos_info);
> > > -	return -EINVAL;
> > > +	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static struct platform_driver exynos_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> > 
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>

I'm assuming that it will go it through the Samsung tree.


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/