linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:51:35 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com> wrote:
> I understand that the change here fixed another regression, but I'm
> wondering if there's a way to make everyone happy here?  I can provide
> debugging info from my system as required...

Maybe sent my mail too quickly, as I have some thoughts after looking
at the code.

>From the link order, drivers/acpi init wll be called before
drivers/pnp init, right?  In my case, the acpi resources ("ACPI
PM1a_EVT_BLK") etc are under a pnp bus.  But if acpi requests the
resources first, then pnp can't request the enclosing range.

Is the right fix to make sure the pnp init happens before acpi
requests resources?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/