[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25627634.TOSvDFmF1a@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 01:23:32 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 04:51:35 PM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com> wrote:
> > I understand that the change here fixed another regression, but I'm
> > wondering if there's a way to make everyone happy here? I can provide
> > debugging info from my system as required...
>
> Maybe sent my mail too quickly, as I have some thoughts after looking
> at the code.
>
> From the link order, drivers/acpi init wll be called before
> drivers/pnp init, right? In my case, the acpi resources ("ACPI
> PM1a_EVT_BLK") etc are under a pnp bus. But if acpi requests the
> resources first, then pnp can't request the enclosing range.
>
> Is the right fix to make sure the pnp init happens before acpi
> requests resources?
I need to have a deeper look at things.
Can you please file a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org to track this and attach
the output of acpidump from the affected system in there?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists