[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and
tdes nodes
Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error
> prevents from probing devices correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.1
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so
it's not exactly a regression.
So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but
it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request
(at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet).
So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this
single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material?
BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/
Thanks, bye,
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> index 6b1bb58..51ddec4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> @@ -1125,10 +1125,10 @@
> compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g46-aes";
> reg = <0xfc044000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> - dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1))
> - AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(41)>,
> - <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1))
> - AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(40)>;
> + dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1)
> + | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(41))>,
> + <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1)
> + | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(40))>;
> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> clocks = <&aes_clk>;
> clock-names = "aes_clk";
> @@ -1139,10 +1139,10 @@
> compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes";
> reg = <0xfc04c000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> - dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1))
> - AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(42)>,
> - <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1))
> - AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(43)>;
> + dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1)
> + | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(42))>,
> + <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1)
> + | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(43))>;
> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> clocks = <&tdes_clk>;
> clock-names = "tdes_clk";
> @@ -1153,8 +1153,8 @@
> compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g46-sha";
> reg = <0xfc050000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <15 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> - dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1))
> - AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(44)>;
> + dmas = <&dma0 (AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1)
> + | AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(44))>;
> dma-names = "tx";
> clocks = <&sha_clk>;
> clock-names = "sha_clk";
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists