[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> writes:
> Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
>> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error
>> prevents from probing devices correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
>> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.1
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>
> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>
> This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so
> it's not exactly a regression.
>
> So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but
> it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request
> (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet).
>
> So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this
> single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material?
I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series.
> BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/
Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork
collects acks automatically as well. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists