[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150610121519.GB1592@katana>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:15:20 +0900
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
galak@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] i2c: at91: print hardware version
> >>>- dev_info(dev->dev, "AT91 i2c bus driver.\n");
> >>>+ dev_info(dev->dev, "AT91 i2c bus driver (version: %#x).\n",
>
> >> It looks as if you rather print the driver's version. :-)
>
> > From my point of view, having a version number for a Linux driver would
> >be strange
>
> Not everybody shares your opinion.
I tend to agree with Sergei but let's keep things simple: I'll make it
"hw version" before applying.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists