[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506102024380.3786@nanos>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:27:10 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: futex_wait() can DoS the tick
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Virgin source or kernels with zillion+ patches, doesn't matter. To test
> virgin source earlier than EFI_STUB I had to pollute the source with
> EFI backports, but nothing else.
>
> Just a sec while I check yet again that absolutely virgin master really
> really does stall.... Yup. I pinned the tescase to CPU3..
>
> LOC: 7432 5803 5418 6387 3371 3039 5757 3080 Local timer interrupts <== here
> LOC: 7560 6028 5632 6394 3538 3195 5937 3084 Local timer interrupts
> LOC: 7747 6135 5720 6394 3543 3262 6087 3086 Local timer interrupts
> LOC: 7930 6206 5785 6394 3571 3288 6303 3087 Local timer interrupts
So now it would be helpful to have a trace to see what CPU3 is
actually doing.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists